Olivia Kroth: Lessons in Russian history – The end of monarchy in France and Russia (Part I)

Lessons in Russian history: The end of monarchy in France and Russia (Part I)

A comparative study

by Olivia Kroth

On the 21st of January 1793, the French King Louis XVI was decapitated in Paris, France. On the 16th of July 1918, Tsar Nicholas II was shot in Yekaterinburg, Russia. 125 years passed between these two events, which seem not to have much in common. However, the decapitation in Paris and the shots in Yekaterinburg were both the result and culmination point of the French Revolution (1789 – 1793) and the Russian October Revolution of 1917, which had been preceded by several minor revolutions, since 1900. The French got rid of the Capet monarchy, the Russians freed themselves of the Romanov dynasty.

Of course, we can detect a lot of differences between the course of events and procedures in France and Russia but also many astounding similarities, as if the Bolsheviks had copied the French revolutionaries. It looks as if the script, «How to end a monarchy», had been written in France, to be used later by the Russian revolutionaries.

In the foreword to one of his books about the French Revolution, Jean-Clément Martin writes: «Louis XVI is publicly guillotined in Paris. The machine, invented by the Revolution, decapitates the representative of a monarchy that had lasted a thousand years. The decision was taken by the Convention, born of an insurrection, on the 10th of August 1792. The event is considerable because of its radicality. … The Revolution is victorious» (Jean-Clément Martin, «L’exécution du roi», Edition Perrin, Paris 2021, p. 7).

Decapitation of King Louis XVI in Paris:

Here we see differences to the events in Russia: the French King’s head was cut off by the blade of the guillotine, the Russian Tsar died from gun wounds. While the French King’s decapitation was executed in public, the last Tsar was shot secretly in a basement of a private house, at night. In Paris, the capital of France, a cheering crowd witnessed how the King’s head was severed from his body. In Yekaterinburg, in the Ural mountains, only 12 men of the Cheka, the Soviet Secret Police, witnessed what happened.

The French author Martin writes: «On Monday, the 21st of January 1793, a green coach comes to pick up King Louis XVI at the Temple, where he is kept in prison. The sky is clouded, the weather is cold» (Martin, p. 19). The French revolutionaries make a big show of this event, almost like a public parade: «As the coach is rolling towards Revolution Square, 100 men from the gendarmerie ride on horses in front, followed by 12 drummers. Behind the coach, 100 national guards ride on horses. This cavalcade is surrounded by 1.200 men from special sections» (Martin, p. 21).

Temple Tower in Paris, the King’s prison:

In Yekaterinburg, 12 Chekists were sufficient to shoot Nicholas II. This happend far away from the capital city of Petrograd, in a cellar at night, without any witnesses except the executioners themselves.

Another difference: In France, Queen Marie-Antoinette was guillotined later, on the 16th of October 1793. In Russia, the Tsar’s wife Alexandra and his five children died at the same time with him.

The Tsar’s family died in the cellar of the Ipatiev House in Yekaterinburg:

The French seemed to enjoy the spectacle of seeing their King decapitated. A huge crowd had gathered for the event, it was like a public holiday for them: «The crowd has completely filled the square, some people have even climbed on lamp posts for a better view. The King takes a few minutes to get out of the coach. The steps leading up to the platform with the guillotine are steep …. At 10:20 in the morning, the King’s head is cut off and shown to the public, before being placed in a basket with the rest of the body» (Martin, p. 28).

At first, the crowd was silent, probably astonished that this was real. Such a monstrous execution had never happened before their eyes. Then they broke out into loud cheers. «The square is filled with shouts: Long life for the Nation! Long life for the Republic! Hundreds of people are dancing around the platform with the guillotine» (Martin, p. 29).

King Louis XVI on the platform of the guillotine:

In Russia, the Bolsheviks tried to hide away the dead bodies of Nicholas II, his wife and five children. They were driven to a wood near Yekaterinburg, then cut into pieces, burned, and the leftovers dissoved with acid. Jean-Christophe Buisson, the French editor of the last Tsar’s diary, writes in his commentary:

«In the early morning hours, the bodies are transported to the ‘Four Brothers’ (a place with four large trees). The bodies are hacked into small pieces and burned. The next morning, those bones which did not burn are dissoved in acid. All the rests are dropped into the pit of an old mine» (Jean-Christophe Buisson, «Journal intime – Nicholas II», Edition Perrin, Paris 2020, p. 251).

‘The Four Brothers» near Yekaterinburg in the Urals:

Two of the first sentences in Jean-Clément Martin’s book are noteworthy: «The event is considerable because of its radicality» and «The Revolution is victorious.» This is also true for Russia, where the October Revolution of 1917 was victorious. The execution of the last Tsar and his family was radical, too.

Nowadays, readers might be shocked by so much cruelty. Why was it necessary to cut the French King’s head off in public? Why was it necessary to shoot, hack, burn and dissolve in acid the bodies of Nicholas II and his family? The Austrian author Stefan Zweig gives an answer in his biography about Queen Marie-Antoinette: «A new epoch is on the march, a huge and brutal, mighty and murderous epoch» (Stefan Zweig, «Marie-Antoinette», Insel Verlag, Leipzig 1922).

Revolutionaries in Saint Petersburg:

Revolutions in general tend to be bloody, brutal, huge, mighty and murderous. They are not for the faint-hearted. They arrive like thunderstorms to blow away all those that hold on for too long to their old privileges and self-proclaimed rights. This is true for the French as well as the Russian Revolution.

Like King Louis XVI in France, Tsar Nicholas II was not very sharp and perceptive. Both could not understand the concept of «liberté, égalité, fraternité», which became the slogan of the French Revolution. They did not like the concept of liberty: liberty of opinion and religion, liberty of the press, liberty of commerce and industry. Furthermore, they did not believe in human rights for the entire population and equality of all ethnic groups, races, social classes.

Stefean Zweig characterized King Louis XVI as follows: «He is handicapped by his timidity. He thinks and speaks slowly. He is sincere but awkward with words and easily confused. When he has enough time to sort out and coordinate his thoughts, when no quick answers are demanded, he will surprise his listeners with his sound judgment and moral integrity.»

The Austrian author continued: «Louis XVI reads a lot and with great pleasure. He has a good knowledge of history and geography. Besides French he has studied English and Latin. And yet, he is capable of writing such banalities in his personal diary like ‘Dear hunt … caught one … got some indigestion’.»

King Louis XVI liked hunting:

In a similar way, Tsar Nicholas II noted down trivialities in his diary: What he ate and drank, what he did or did not do because the prison guards would not let him. What his wife did, what his children did, all of his wife’s daily ailings, his children’s ailings … He makes them look like a family of hypochondriacs.

Reading these notes, we might be tempted to think that this is the diary of a simpleton but Tsar Nicholas II was a well educated person. He spoke several foreign languages and read plenty of books, just like King Louis XVI. What is missing in the Tsar’s diary, are the conclusions he drew. Did he understand what he read? How did he interprete what he read? He does not give us the slightest clue.

Library of Tsar Nicholas II in the Winter Palace of Saint Petersburg:

Stefan Zweig summed up his analysis of the French King’s personality: «Louis XVI was a man of average intelligence, little inclined to independence. He could have worked as an office clerk or a customs officer. His nature predestined him to some type of menial, mechanic work, at the marge of events, at whatever work he found, except that of ruling a country.

Just like the French King, the last Romanov Tsar was a person of average intelligence. He liked horseback riding and adored the military, he could have become a hussar in the Russian cavalry. He loved books, he could have worked as a librarian or bookshop keeper, anything except sitting on the throne of the Russian Tsars.

Nicholas II on horseback with his military:

Stefan Zweig thought the true tragedy of Louis XVI was that he had lead in his blood, something heavy and rigid, obstructing his veins, nothing was easy for him. The true tragedy of Nicholas II seems to have been that he had too much air in his head, something light and flighty, like a balloon that tends to fly away. In his youth, things had been made too easy for him by his family, especially his «dear mama», who doted on him. Later, when the Bolsheviks imprisoned him, he could not understand why this happened to him.

Stefan Zweig wrote: «Still today, Versailles affirms itself as the grandest and most provoking symbol of royalty, apparently without the slightest necessity, a huge castle with hundreds of windows looking down on the park and its ingeniously constructed canals. This palace dresses itself with splendid folly in front of the astounded visitors’ eyes.»

Versailles Castle:

The same is true for the palaces in Saint Petersburg, built by various Tsars of the Romanov dynasty. They were all splendid provocations in the eyes of those who lived in huts, shacks or communal flats. Just like Versailles in France, the palaces of Saint Petersburg in Russia are now properties of the state, open to visitors. They do no longer provoke us, since the French and the Russian royalties have been abolished.

The aristocrats of France and Russia regretted losing their privileges, when the monarchy ended. In France, the cities of Lyon, Orléans, Lille, Sedan and certain départements were «en deuil», in mourning. The French aristocrats fled abroad. The same happened in Russia. To escape the Bolshevik executions, many aristocratic families left their homes and settled in Europe, where their descendents are still living today.

The last Tsar’s family with cossack guards:

To be continued: “The end of monarchy in France and Russia” (Part II) will be published in March 2023.

Olivia Kroth: The journalist and author of four books lives in Russia. Her blog:


This article was also published in THE DURAN:

Anuncio publicitario

Acerca de olivia2010kroth

Writer, journalist: The Duran https://olivia2010kroth.wordpress.com
Esta entrada fue publicada en Uncategorized. Guarda el enlace permanente.

31 respuestas a Olivia Kroth: Lessons in Russian history – The end of monarchy in France and Russia (Part I)

  1. Thank you for this comment, Colin.

    Le gusta a 2 personas

  2. Indira dijo:

    Interesting historical ‘journey’ !! Well written and presented, Olivia!

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  3. Thank you, Indira.
    I am glad you find this historical «journey» interesting.
    The journey will continue with part II in March (English) and Part III in May (English).
    In between I will translate into German, since I publish in both languages.

    Le gusta a 2 personas

  4. Giannis Pit dijo:

    Maybe the two biggest revolutions in human history that changed the whole world, even nowadays. I follow your journey, Olivia.

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  5. I look forward to reading more, in due course! Be well!

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  6. Thank you for your interest, Colin.

    Le gusta a 2 personas

  7. Thank you, dear Giannis.
    You are a true «fellow traveler», I like your company on this exciting journey.

    Le gusta a 2 personas

  8. You are very welcome!

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  9. Interessante il tuo articolo di comparazione storica tra gli eventi della Rivoluzione Francese e quella Russa. Sono state radicali ambedue, ma le cose per le persone meno abbienti non sono cambiate. Fa male al cuore se, si pensa allo sfarzo in cui vivevano i regnanti e la povertà assoluta in cui era costretto a vivere il popolo. Ecco perché avvengono le grandi rivoluzioni, per cercare di equiparare i diritti sociali con delle riforme più eque. quantomeno. Ma alla fine non è mai così, anche se all’inizio ci sono tutte le buone intenzioni di attuarle, ma, alla fine si devia perché la bilancia tende per i più abbienti, lasciando fuori i più deboli. Un caro saluto Olivia, Grazia!

    Le gusta a 2 personas

  10. Merci pour le commentaire Grazia.
    Je suis d’accord : les révolutions n’atteignent jamais pleinement leurs objectifs. Il n’existe pas d’état parfait, idéal. Il y aura toujours des pauvres et des riches. Cela est dû à la nature humaine, pas seulement aux conditions sociales.
    Mais au moins en Russie aujourd’hui, il n’y a plus de servage. Tout le monde a (théoriquement) les mêmes droits.
    Mais comme le dit le proverbe : «Certaines personnes sont plus égales que d’autres»….
    Cela vaut aussi pour la France. J’aime bien lire la revue aristocratique «Le Point de Vue». Il y a toujours des rapports de mariages nobles, de naissances de nouveaux princes et princesses, etc. Pouvez-vous imaginer cela ? Les titres et privilèges de noblesse sont abolis depuis plusieurs centaines d’années, mais la noblesse s’accroche à ses titres, exhibe ses châteaux et célèbre des mariages grandioses.
    Les temps changent et pour la plupart restent les mêmes.

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  11. Giannis Pit dijo:

    Oh, thank you very much, my friend.

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  12. Je trouve les similitudes que vous avez détaillées entre les deux très intéressant.


    Le gusta a 1 persona

  13. Merci Mirada.
    Deuxième part: mars 2023.

    Le gusta a 2 personas

  14. Ce sera un plaisir de le lire.

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  15. Merci Mirada.
    Troisième part: Mai 2023.

    Le gusta a 2 personas

  16. Buen post. Un cordial saludo desde el sur de España 🇪🇸

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  17. almerighi dijo:

    Very interesting article,
    both in France and in Russia the monarchy died in a bloodbath.
    The czars lived in unbridled luxury behind a very poor people, there were still serfs.
    The Russo-Japanese war and the First World War were the coup de grace to a regime that had been crumbling for decades.
    Greetings from Italy

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  18. Muchas gracias, pkmundo.

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  19. Thank you, Flavio.
    Thankfully, the tsarist regime ended.
    With friendly greetings from Russia.

    Le gusta a 2 personas

  20. Olivia, I am truly grateful for this reading which I found extremely interesting and perfect in the alternation of quotations, in the comparison, in the story, in the explanation.
    And I thank you because I had never considered history from the point of view of a comparison like the one that you have been able to do expertly!

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  21. Thank you, Claudia.
    This is a new way of working for me. I have never done comparative studies before.
    After finishing the cycle of «The last days of the last Tsar» (five parts) I thought it was time to try something new.
    At that time, the anniversary of the French Revolution was being celebrated in France, with lots of interesting new books coming out.
    I bought the one by Martin about the French King’s execution, which was a fascinating read and which I quote often, as you have noticed.
    After reading Martin’s book, I thought: Why not compare this event to the one that happened in Yekaterinburg, when the last Tsar was shot? After all, both revolutions were similar and can be compared.
    So it all started …

    Le gusta a 2 personas

  22. bernard25 dijo:

    Bonjour OLIVIA belle représentation , agréable dimanche et semaine à venir bisous de moi Bernard

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  23. Un bon dimanche et une belle semaine à venir pour vous aussi, cher Bernard.

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  24. Yogesh D dijo:

    Very interesting historical Information. The comparative study of the two countries is amazing. Beheading, hanging from the open platform was very popular in ancient centuries, perhaps the reason behind this would be to show the fear of the ruling king to the public, so that no one could raise their voice against them again. Very nice post ma’am! 👌👌Many congratulations to you… waiting for next post…🙏🙏😊🌻

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  25. Thank you, dear Yogesh.
    Showing the beheading on the platform to the public was certainly intimidating. You are right. People would not have dared to say anything against it, and those who did not agree, especially the aristocracy, were certainly not present. They fled abroad to save their own lives.
    Part two will appear in March. Until then ….
    All the best to you.

    Le gusta a 2 personas

  26. You had a great idea Olivia!
    I find it amazing when this kind of enlightenment of the mind comes!
    And I’m grateful for sharing your studies!

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  27. Thank you, Claudia.
    I like it that you call my work «enlightenment».
    This is what it is supposed to be.

    Le gusta a 2 personas

  28. And that’s exactly what it is!

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  29. Thanks a lot for this flattering compliment, Claudia. You have made my day.

    Le gusta a 2 personas

Los comentarios están cerrados.